1901 Detroit Tigers
Franchise seasons · 1900s seasons
Independent, unofficial historical lineup simulator. Games here are simulated exhibitions, not historical results.
Compare historical seasons
Detroit Tigers franchise archive · Available years: 1901–2025 · 125 seasons.
These historical season records are separate from simulated exhibitions. — means the season record is unavailable. Year ranges describe this archive's coverage; team names reflect each season's historical name.
Same team, nearby years
| Season | Record (W–L) | Batting rows | Pitching rows |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1905 Detroit Tigers | 79–74 | 18 | 13 |
| 1904 Detroit Tigers | 62–90 | 17 | 8 |
| 1903 Detroit Tigers | 65–71 | 17 | 10 |
| 1902 Detroit Tigers | 52–83 | 17 | 12 |
| 1901 Detroit Tigers · Current season | 74–61 | 12 | 7 |
Same era: other teams in 1901
- 1901 Baltimore Orioles · 68–65
- 1901 Boston Americans · 79–57
- 1901 Chicago White Stockings · 83–53
- 1901 Cincinnati Reds · —
- 1901 Milwaukee Brewers · 48–89
- 1901 New York Giants · 52–85
More teams from 1901
- 1901 Philadelphia Athletics · 74–62
- 1901 Philadelphia Phillies · —
- 1901 Pittsburgh Pirates · —
- 1901 St. Louis Cardinals · 76–64
- 1901 Washington Senators · 61–72
Roster and season statistics
Only players appear here. Staff are excluded from lineup choices. — means a statistic is unavailable. A roster player may have no batting or pitching row if they did not appear in those tables.
| Player | Position group | No. | Stat rows | AB | H | HR | AVG | IP | ERA | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Cronin | Pitchers | — | pitching | — | — | — | — | 219.67 | 3.89 | Average (49) — 42 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.89 over 219.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Emil Frisk | Pitchers | — | pitching | — | — | — | — | 74.67 | 4.34 | Average (47) — 52 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 4.34 over 74.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Ed High | Pitchers | — | pitching | — | — | — | — | 18.00 | 3.50 | Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance. |
| Roscoe Miller | Pitchers | — | pitching | — | — | — | — | 332.00 | 2.95 | Average (57) — 13 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 2.95 over 332.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Frank Owen | Pitchers | — | pitching | — | — | — | — | 56.00 | 4.34 | Average (48) — 44 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 4.34 over 56.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Ed Siever | Pitchers | — | pitching | — | — | — | — | 288.67 | 3.24 | Average (54) — 19 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.24 over 288.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Joe Yeager | Pitchers | — | pitching | — | — | — | — | 199.67 | 2.61 | Average (58) — 9 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 2.61 over 199.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Fritz Buelow | Catchers | — | batting | 231 | 52 | 2 | .225 | — | — | Average (46) — 112 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 231 at-bats and 2 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Sport McAllister | Catchers | — | batting | 306 | 92 | 3 | .301 | — | — | Average (55) — 33 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 306 at-bats and 3 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Al Shaw | Catchers | — | batting | 171 | 46 | 1 | .269 | — | — | Average (50) — 77 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 171 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Doc Casey | Infielders | — | batting | 540 | 153 | 2 | .283 | — | — | Average (52) — 56 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 540 at-bats and 2 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Davey Crockett | Infielders | — | batting | 102 | 29 | 0 | .284 | — | — | Average (51) — 67 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 102 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Pop Dillon | Infielders | — | batting | 281 | 81 | 1 | .288 | — | — | Average (52) — 56 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 281 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Kid Elberfeld | Infielders | — | batting | 432 | 133 | 3 | .308 | — | — | Average (56) — 25 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 432 at-bats and 3 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Kid Gleason | Infielders | — | batting | 547 | 150 | 3 | .274 | — | — | Average (51) — 67 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 547 at-bats and 3 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Harry Lochhead | Infielders | — | batting | 4 | 2 | 0 | .500 | — | — | Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance. |
| Jimmy Barrett | Outfielders | — | batting | 542 | 159 | 4 | .293 | — | — | Average (54) — 39 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 542 at-bats and 4 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Ducky Holmes | Outfielders | — | batting | 537 | 158 | 4 | .294 | — | — | Average (54) — 39 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 537 at-bats and 4 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
| Kid Nance | Outfielders | — | batting | 461 | 129 | 3 | .280 | — | — | Average (52) — 56 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 461 at-bats and 3 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league. |
Build a lineup
Exhibition rules use nine hitters, including a DH, and one pitcher. The numbered slots are the batting order. Pick each player once. Opponent: 1901 Baltimore Orioles. Players without a rating remain selectable with estimated performance.
Simulated exhibition
Choose a lineup to play an exhibition.
Batting lines
Game log for the selected game
Roster and statistics adapted from Wikipedia contributors, 1901 Detroit Tigers season. Retrieved 2026-09-30T17:12:19.013830+00:00. Source material is under CC BY-SA 4.0. We grouped roster entries, excluded staff, joined stats by Wikipedia page title, converted baseball innings notation to outs, and derived approximate ratings and simulated outcomes. No official affiliation.